ISSN: 2038-6931
Oneri di bonifica dei rifiuti: prospettive di evoluzione
Oneri di bonifica dei rifiuti: prospettive di evoluzione
Trovare chi e cosa bonificare in mezzo all’inferno: quello è il vero inferno.
Parole chiave: rifiuti, oneri, bonifica, ambiente, ecoreati
SECONDA EDIZIONE DEL CORSO DI FORMAZIONE
18 DICEMBRE 2018 ORE 14,30 – 17,30
AULA T4-EDIFICIO DIDATTICA-DIPARTIMENTO DI ECONOMIA, VIA COLUMBIA 2.
PER INFORMAZIONI CONTATTARE: MAIL INFO@ASSPRICOM.IT / CENTRO@CREG.UNIROMA2.IT WEB: WWW.WEB.UNIROMA2.IT – WWW.CREG.UNIROMA2.IT
UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA “TOR VERGATA” Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza
“Il D.lgs. 101/2018 e la riforma del Codice Privacy ” “Le nuove fattispecie di reato privacy introdotte dalla riforma del Codice Privacy”
“Il Data Protection Officer: la nuova figura professionale per aziende e Pubblica Amministrazione”
Interverranno come relatori esperti della Privacy del mondo accademico ed istituzionale.
AULA T4 – Edificio Didattica – Dipartimento di Economia
(Via Columbia 2 – Roma)
“La dimensione internazionale della Privacy con riferimento al Regolamento UE 2016/679”
Min. Pl. Antonio Alessandro – Ministero degli Affari Esteri
“Il Data Protection Officer: la nuova figura professionale per aziende e Pubblica Amminstrazione”
Dott. Francesco Modafferi Dirigente Dipartimento libertà pubbliche e sanità del Garante per la Protezione dei Dati Personali
“La Privacy ed i reati informatici: metodologia di indagine e sanzioni”
Dott. Eugenio Albamonte Sostituto Procuratore della Repubblica c/o Tribunale Ordinario di Roma e Presidente Associazione Nazionale Magistrati.
Presentazione del corso e del corpo docente a cura del Coordinamento didattico
Avv. Domenico Vozza Vice Presidente Associazione Privacy & Compliance
Avv. Paolo Iafrate – Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”
Modera: Prof. Enzo Rossi Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata” e Presidente Centro Ricerche Economiche e Giuridiche (C.R.E.G.)
Per informazioni:
Tel. + 06.89346809
Email: INFO@ASSPRICOM.IT
CENTRO@CREG.UNIROMA2.IT
Il Centro di Ricerche Economiche e Giuridiche Università di Roma “Tor Vergata” (CREG, Centro Ricerche Economiche Giuridiche), Sezione FOR.IN.A.C (Forensics, Intelligence/Analisi Criminale) insieme a Thomson Reuters sono lieti di invitarvi a questa conferenza gratuita.
Le nuove dinamiche che caratterizzano il terrorismo e gli atti di violenza emersi negli attentati susseguitisi a livello globale nel 2015 e 2016 pongono nuove sfide al business.
Il 2017 è il primo anno in cui si registra per gli investitori un calo del rischio politico in tanti Paesi ma altrettanti sono quelli in cui tale rischio è aumentato. A risentire maggiormente dell’incertezza politica nelle economie sviluppate, come quelle degli Stati Uniti ed europee, sembrano essere i principali attori in Asia, così come i produttori di commodity dell’Africa, del Medio Oriente e del Nord Africa.
INTERVENGONO:
– On. Massimo Artini, Vice Presidente della Commissione Difesa.
– Mauro Albani, Ricercatore Istat- Direzione Centrale per le Statistiche Sociali e il Censimento della Popolazione.
– Prof. Enzo Rossi, Presidente del CREG Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata” – Direttore del Master MEDIM, II livello .
– Prof. Avv.Paolo Iafrate. Docente in Regolamentazione Nazionale ed Europea in materia di Immigrazione, Project manager Criminalistica e Scienze Forensi, Sezione FOR NI. A.C. – CREG, Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”.
– Arije Antinori PhD, Senior Expert on Terrorism and Organised Crime, Project manager Intelligence/Analisi Criminale, Sezione FOR.IN.A.C – CREG, Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”.
– Luigi Cimaschi, CEO Thomson Reuters Italia.
– Francesca Boccia, Market Development GRC, Thomson Reuters.
TAVOLA ROTONDA
MODERA: Lisa Jucca, Columnist at Reuters Breakingview
A CHI SI RIVOLGE L’EVENTO:
We offer a holistic view (and formal representation) of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS), in which the national objectives of the states emerge in terms of trade-off between control and respect of the asylum seekers’ human rights. Control of access implies spillover of the flows towards neighbouring states and rivalries between the states in a non-cooperative game. An asylum system is a set of rules designed to settle rivalries, balancing out the national objectives. Thus, on the basis of a Pareto (unanimity) criterion, one system is preferred to another if all the states are better able to achieve their national objectives. We examine the conditions under which a relocation system based on quotas may be preferable to the Dublin rules, and the reasons why closer harmonisation of standards can favour adoption of such a system. Finally, we comment on the possible outcomes when unanimity is not achieved.
ROSSI – Balancing national objectives and settling rivalries.
We provide empirical support for an analytical DSGE model with nominal wage stickiness where growth is driven by learning-by-doing and money shocks and their variance are allowed to impact on long-run output growth. In our theoretical model the variance of monetary shocks has a negative effect on growth, while output volatility is good for growth as a positive relationship exists. Using a bivariate GARCH-M model we test the empirical conditional mean and variance relationships of nominal money and production growth rates in the G7 countries. We corroborate the theoretical model predictions with evidence from Bonferroni multiple tests across the G7.
ANDREOU – PELLONI – SENSIER – Is volatility good for growth. Evidence from the G7
Is it possible to increase growth and welfare by raising taxes anddisposing of the tax revenues? We show this may indeed be the case
in a simple model with endogenous technical change, represented by an increase in the variety of intermediate goods.
LONG – PELLONI – WALDMANN – Lump-sum taxation in a R&D model
We consider the optimal factor income taxation in a standard R&D model with technical change represented by an increase in the variety of intermediate goods. We show that the model has no transitional dynamics. Redistributing the tax burden from labor to capital will in most cases increase the employment rate in equilibrium. This has opposite e¤ects on two distortions in the model, one due to monopoly power, the second to the incomplete appropriability of the bene ts of inventions. Their relative momentum determines the sign of the welfare e¤ect of the redistribution. We show that, for parameter values consistent with available estimates, the optimal tax rate on capital will be sizable.
LONG – PELLONI – Factor income tax in a horizontal innovation model
The recent availability of cross-sectional and longitudinal survey data on life satisfaction in a large number of countries gives us the opportunity to verify empirically (and not just to assume) what matters for individuals and what economists and policymakers should take into account when trying to promote personal and societal wellbeing. The wide array of econometric findings available in this booming literature display evidence, generally robust to different cultural backgrounds, on the effects of some important happiness drivers (income, unemployment, marital status) which can be considered “quasi stylized facts” of happiness. If economic policies, for many obvious reasons, cannot maximize self declared life satisfaction as such, we are nonetheless learning a lot from these contributions. In particular, results on the relevance and the risk of crowding out of relational goods, on the revisited inflation/unemployment trade off and, more in general, on the measurement of the shadow value of non market goods obtained with life satisfaction estimates, are conveying relevant information about individual preferences and what is behind utility functions. Such findings suggest us to move beyond anthropological reductionism toward behavioral complexity and to refocus target indicators of economic policies in order to minimize the distance between economic development and human wellbeing.
BECCHETTI – PELLONI – What are we learning from the life satisfaction literature
We study the implications of having diferent sources of nominal rigidities on the relationship between productivity growth and shocks volatility in a model with procyclical R&D and imperfect competition in goods and labour markets. We show that the efects of uncertainty on long-term growth not only depends on the source of fluctuations, as recent literature shows, but also, and crucially, on whether prices and/or wages are rigid.
UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI ROMA "TOR VERGATA"